For admission: 900-362-5277 / 994-047-1271

Contact: +91 9952971485

Email : office@adhi.edu.in

NAAC

IIQA Extended Profile Criterion 1 Criterion 2 Criterion 3 Criterion 4 Criterion 5 Criterion 6 Criterion 7 DVV Clarifications Code of Conduct Institutional Distinctiveness Self Declaration
click here.. download button

Extended Profile

1.1 Numbers of students year wise during the last five years

2.1 Number of full time teachers during the last five years

2.2 Number of teaching staff / full time teachers year wise during the last five years

3.1 Expenditure excluding salary component year wise during the last five years (INR in lakhs)

Criterion 1 – Curricular Aspects (100)

METRIC NO DESCRIPTION WEIGHTAGE
Key Indicator – 1.1 Curricular Planning and Implementation(20)
1.1.1
QlM		 The institution ensures effective curriculum planning and delivery through a well-planned and documented process including Academic calendar and conduct of continuous Internal Assessment. 20
Key Indicator - 1.2 Academic Flexibility(30)
1.2.1
QnM		 Number of Add-on / Certificate / Value added courses offered on the MOOC programs like SWAYAM, NPTEL, etc. where the students of the institution have benefited during the last five years. 15
1.2.2
QnM		 Percentage of students enrolled in Certificate / Add-on /Value added courses and also completed online MOOC programs like SWAYAM, NPTEL, etc., as against the total number of students during the last five years. 15
Key Indicator - 1.3 Curriculum Enrichment(30)
1.3.1
QlM		 Institution integrates crosscutting issues relevant to Professional Ethics, Gender, Human Values, Environment and Sustainability in transacting the curriculum. 10
1.3.2
QnM		 Percentage of students undertaking project work/field work/ internships (Data for the latest completed academic year). 20
Key Indicator - 1.4 Feedback System (20)
1.4.1
QnM		 Institution obtains feedback on the academic performance and ambience of the institution from various stakeholders, such as Students, Teachers, Employers, Alumni etc. and action taken report on the feedback is made available on institutional website.

Feedback processes of the institution may be classified as follows:

A. Feedback collected, analysed, action taken & communicated to the relevant bodies and feedback hosted on the institutional website.
B. Feedback collected, analysed and action has been taken and communicated to the relevant bodies.
C. Feedback collected and analysed.
D. Feedback collected.
E. Feedback not collected.
 20

Criterion 2 – Teaching Learning and Evaluation (350)

METRIC NO DESCRIPTION WEIGHTAGE
Key Indicator – 2.1. Student Enrolment and Profile (40)
2.1.1
QnM		 Enrolment percentage 20
2.1.2
QnM		 Percentage of seats filled against reserved categories (SC, ST, OBC etc.) as per applicable reservation policy for the first year admission during the last five years 20
Key Indicator – 2.2. Student Teacher Ratio (40)
2.2.1
QnM		 Student – Full time Teacher Ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year) 40
Key Indicator 2.3. Teaching- Learning Process (40)
2.3.1
QlM		 Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences and teachers use ICT- enabled tools including online resources for effective teaching and learning process 40
Key Indicator 2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality (40)
2.4.1
QnM		 Percentage of full-time teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years 15
2.4.2
QnM		 Percentage of full time teachers with NET/SET/SLET/ Ph. D./D.Sc. / D.Litt./L.L.D. during the last five years (consider only highest degree for count) 25
Key Indicator 2.5. Evaluation Process and Reforms (40)
2.5.1
QlM		 Mechanism of internal/ external assessment is transparent and the grievance redressal system is time- bound and efficient 40
Key Indicator 2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcome (90)
2.6.1
QlM		 Programme Outcomes (POs) and Course Outcomes (COs) for all Programmes offered by the institution are stated and displayed on website 25
2.6.2
QlM		 Attainment of POs and COs are evaluated. 20
2.6.3
QnM		 Pass percentage of Students during last five years (excluding backlog students) 45
Key Indicator – 2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey (60)
2.7.1
QnM		 Online student satisfaction survey regarding to teaching learning process. 60

Criterion 3 – Research, Innovations and Extension (110)

METRIC NO DESCRIPTION WEIGHTAGE
Key Indicator- 3.1 Resource Mobilization for Research (10)
3.1.1
QnM		 Grants received from Government and non-governmental agencies for research projects / endowments in the institution during the last five years. 10
Key Indicator- 3.2 Innovation Ecosystem (15)
3.2.1
QlM		 Institution has created an ecosystem for innovations, Indian Knowledge System (IKS),including awareness about IPR, establishment of IPR cell, Incubation centre and other initiatives for the creation and transfer of knowledge/technology and the outcomes of the same are evident 10
3.2.2
QnM		 Number of workshops/seminars/conferences including programs conducted on Research Methodology, Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and entrepreneurship during the last five years 5
Key Indicator- 3.3 Research Publication and Awards (25)
3.3.1
QnM		 Number of research papers published per teacher in the Journals as notified on UGC CARE list during the last five years 10
3.3.2
QnM		 Number of books and chapters in edited volumes/books published and papers published in national/ international conference proceedings per teacher during last five years 15
Key Indicator- 3.4 Extension Activities (40)
3.4.1
QlM		 Outcomes of Extension activities in the neighborhood community in terms of impact and sensitizing the students to social issues for their holistic development during the last five years. 15
3.4.2
QlM		 Awards and recognitions received for extension activities from government / government recognised bodies 5
3.4.3
QnM		 Number of extension and outreach programs conducted by the institution through organized forums including NSS/NCC with involvement of community during the last five years 20
Key Indicator- 3.5 Collaboration (20)
3.5.1
QnM		 Number of functional MoUs/linkages with institutions/ industries in India and abroad for internship, on-the-job training, project work, student / faculty exchange and collaborative research during the last five years 20

Criterion 4 – Infrastructure and Learning Resources (100)

METRIC NO DESCRIPTION WEIGHTAGE
Key Indicator 4.1 Physical Facilities (30)
4.1.1
QlM		 The Institution has adequate infrastructure and other facilities for
a. teaching learning, viz., classrooms, laboratories, computing equipment etc
b. ICT – enabled facilities such as smart class, LMS etc.
Facilities for Cultural and sports activities, yoga centre, games (indoor and outdoor), Gymnasium, auditorium etc		 20
4.1.2
QnM		 Percentage of expenditure for infrastructure development and augmentation excluding salary during the last five years 10
Key Indicator – 4.2 Library as a learning Resource (20)
4.2.1
QlM		 Library is automated with digital facilities using Integrated Library Management System (ILMS), adequate subscriptions to e-resources and journals are made. The library is optimally used by the faculty and students 20
Key Indicator 4.3 IT Infrastructure (30)
4.3.1
QlM		 Institution frequently updates its IT facilities and provides sufficient bandwidth for internet connection 20
4.3.2
QnM		 Student Computer ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year) 10
Key Indicator 4.4 Maintenance of Campus Infrastructure (20)
4.4.1
QnM		 Percentage expenditure incurred on maintenance of physical facilities and academic support facilities excluding salary component, during the last five years 20

Criterion 5 Student Support and Progression (140)

METRIC NO DESCRIPTION WEIGHTAGE
Key Indicator 5.1 Student Support (50)
5.1.1
QnM		 Percentage of students benefited by scholarships and freeships provided by the institution, government and non-government bodies, industries, individuals, philanthropists during the last five years 20
5.1.2
QnM		 Following capacity development and skills enhancement activities are organized for improving students capability
1. Soft skills
2. Language and communication skills
3. Life skills (Yoga, physical fitness, health and hygiene, selfemployment and entrepreneurial skills)
4. Awareness of trends in technology		 10
5.1.3
QnM		 Percentage of students benefitted by guidance for competitive examinations and career counseling offered by the Institution during the last five years 10
5.1.4
QnM		 The institution adopts the following for redressal of student grievances including sexual harassment and ragging cases
1. Implementation of guidelines of statutory/regulatory bodies
2. Organisation wide awareness and undertakings on policies with zero tolerance
3. Mechanisms for submission of online/offline students grievances
4. Timely redressal of the grievances through appropriate committees		 10
Key Indicator 5.2 Student Progression (35)
5.2.1
QnM		 Percentage of placement of outgoing students and students progressing to higher education during the last five years 25
5.2.2
QnM		 Percentage of students qualifying in state/national/ international level examinations during the last five years 10
Key Indicator – 5.3 Student Participation and Activities (45)
5.3.1
QnM		 Number of awards/medals for outstanding performance in sports/ cultural activities at University / state/ national / international level during the last five years 20
5.3.2
QnM		 Average number of sports and cultural programs in which students of the Institution participated during last five years 25
Key Indicator – 5.4 Alumni Engagement (10)
5.4.1
QlM		 There is a registered Alumni Association that contributes significantly to the development of the institution through financial and/or other support services 10

Criterion 6 – Governance, Leadership and Management (100)

METRIC NO DESCRIPTION WEIGHTAGE
Key Indicator 6.1 Institutional Vision and Leadership (15)
6.1.1
QlM		 The institutional governance and leadership are in accordance with the vision and mission of the Institution and it is visible in various institutional practices such as NEP implementation, sustained institutional growth, decentralization, participation in the institutional governance and in their short term and long term Institutional Perspective Plan. 15
Key Indicator 6.2 Strategy Development and Deployment (12)
6.2.1
QlM		 The institutional perspective plan is effectively deployed and functioning of the institutional bodies is effective and efficient as visible from policies, administrative setup, appointment, service rules, and procedures, etc. 8
6.2.2
QnM		 Institution implements e-governance in its operations
1. Administration including complaint management
2. Finance and Accounts
3. Student Admission and Support
4. Examinations		 4
Key Indicator 6.3 Faculty Empowerment Strategies (33)
6.3.1
QlM		 The institution has performance appraisal system, effective welfare measures for teaching and non-teaching staff and avenues for career development/progression 6
6.3.2
QnM		 Percentage of teachers provided with financial support to attend conferences/workshops and towards membership fee of professional bodies during the last five years 12
6.3.3
QnM		 Percentage of teaching and non-teaching staff participating in Faculty development Programmes (FDP), Management Development Programmes (MDPs) professional development /administrative training programs during the last five years 15
Key Indicator – 6.4 Financial Management and Resource Mobilization (10)
6.4.1
QlM		 Institution has strategies for mobilization and optimal utilization of resources and funds from various sources (government/ nongovernment organizations) and it conducts financial audits regularly (internal and external) 10
Key Indicator 6.5 Internal Quality Assurance System (30)
6.5.1
QlM		 Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) has contributed significantly for institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies and processes. It reviews teaching learning process, structures & methodologies of operations and learning outcomes at periodic intervals and records the incremental improvement in various activities 15
6.5.2
QnM		 Quality assurance initiatives of the institution include:
1. Regular meeting of Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC); Feedback collected, analysed and used for improvements
2. Collaborative quality initiatives with other institution(s) / membership of international networks
3. Participation in NIRF
4. Any other quality audit/accreditation recognized by state, national or international agencies such as NAAC, NBA, ISO Certification etc		 15

Criterion 7 Institutional Values and Best Practices (100)

METRIC NO DESCRIPTION WEIGHTAGE
Key Indicator – 7.1 Institutional Values and Social Responsibilities (50)
7.1.1
QlM		 Institution has initiated the Gender Audit and measures for the promotion of gender equity during the last five years. 10
7.1.2
QnM		 The Institution has facilities and initiatives for
1. Alternate sources of energy and energy conservation measures
2. Management of the various types of degradable and nondegradable waste
3. Water conservation
4. Green campus initiatives
5. Disabled-friendly, barrier free environment		 20
7.1.3
QnM		 Quality audits on environment and energy regularly undertaken by the Institution. The institutional environment and energy initiatives are confirmed through the following
1. Green audit / Environment audit
2. Energy audit
3. Clean and green campus initiatives
4. Beyond the campus environmental promotion activities		 10
7.1.4
QlM		 Describe the Institutional efforts/initiatives in providing an inclusive environment i.e., tolerance and harmony towards cultural, regional, linguistic, communal socioeconomic diversity and Sensitization of students and employees to the constitutional obligations: values, rights, duties and responsibilities of citizens 10
Key Indicator 7.2 Best Practices (30)
7.2.1
QlM		 Describe two best practices successfully implemented by the Institution as per NAAC format provided in the Manual 30
Key Indicator – 7.3 Institutional Distinctiveness (20)
7.3.1
QlM		 Portray the performance of the Institution in one area distinctive to its priority and thrust within 1000 words 20

DVV Clarifications

Extended Profile
Criterion 1
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
3.1.1 Grants received from Government and non-governmental agencies for research projects / endowments in the institution during the last five years (INR in Lakhs)
3.2.2 Number of workshops/seminars/conferences including on Research Methodology, Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and entrepreneurship conducted during the last five years
3.3.1 Number of research papers published per teacher in the Journals notified on UGC care list during the last five years
3.3.2 Number of books and chapters in edited volumes/books published and papers published in national/ international conference proceedings per teacher during last five years
3.4.3 Number of extension and outreach programs conducted by the institution through organized forums including NSS/NCC with involvement of community during the last five years.
3.5.1 Number of functional MoUs/linkages with institutions/ industries in India and abroad for internship, on-the-job training, project work, student / faculty exchange and collaborative research during the last five years.
Criterion 4
Criterion 5
5.1.1 Percentage of students benefited by scholarships and freeships provided by the institution, government and non-government bodies, industries, individuals, philanthropists during the last five years
5.1.2 Following capacity development and skills enhancement activities are organised for improving students capability
1. Soft skills 2. Language and communication skills 3. Life skills (Yoga, physical fitness, health and hygiene) 4. ICT/computing skills
5.1.3 Percentage of students benefitted by guidance for competitive examinations and career counseling offered by the Institution during the last five years
5.1.4 The institution adopts the following for redressal of student grievances including sexual harassment and ragging cases
1. Implementation of guidelines of statutory/regulatory bodies 2. Organisation wide awareness and undertakings on policies with zero tolerance 3. Mechanisms for submission of online/offline students grievances 4. Timely redressal of the grievances through appropriate committees
5.2.1 Percentage of placement of outgoing students and students progressing to higher education during the last five years
5.2.2 Percentage of students qualifying in state/national/ international level examinations during the last five years
5.3.1 Number of awards/medals for outstanding performance in sports/ cultural activities at University / state/ national / international level (award for a team event should be counted as one) during the last five years
5.3.2 Average number of sports and cultural programs in which students of the Institution participated during last five years (organised by the institution/other institutions)
Criterion 6
6.2.2 Institution implements e-governance in its operations
1. Administration 2. Finance and Accounts 3. Student Admission and Support 4. Examination
6.3.2 Percentage of teachers provided with financial support to attend conferences/workshops and towards membership fee of professional bodies during the last five years
6.3.3 Percentage of teaching and non-teaching staff participating in Faculty development Programmes (FDP), Management Development Programmes (MDPs) professional development /administrative training programs during the last five years
6.5.2 Quality assurance initiatives of the institution include:
1. Regular meeting of Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC); quality improvement initiatives identified and implemented 2. Academic and Administrative Audit (AAA) and follow-up action taken 3. Collaborative quality initiatives with other institution(s) 4. Participation in NIRF and other recognized rankings 5. Any other quality audit/accreditation recognized by state, national or international agencies such as NAAC, NBA etc.
Criterion 7

Code of Conduct

click here.. download button

Institutional Distinctiveness

The ADHI College of Engineering and Technology started in 2008, situated in the Industrial area of Oragadam, Walajabad, and Kanchipuram Dt. Our College is affiliated to Anna University, Chennai, and approved by AICTE, New Delhi. Currently, we offer six Undergraduate Programmes such as B.E. Computer Science Engineering, B.E. Electrical and Electronics Engineering, B.E. Electronics and Communication Engineering, B.E. Mechanical Engineering, B.Tech Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, B.Tech Information Technology, which comprises of well experienced teaching and non-teaching staff members.

Our enthusiastic faculty members keep themselves up to date with current technology and trends by attending national and international conferences, workshops, Skill development Programmes, and seminars. Our faculty motivates the students to take up online courses, add-on courses, and Value Added Courses to make them more competitive in the current scenario. The faculty also motivates our students to participate in technical events such as paper presentations, project presentations, quizzes, design challenges, and hackathons which gives our students a happy learning environment in our college. Our Institution strictly adapts the curriculum and syllabi prescribed by Anna University, Chennai. With the help of the academic schedule prescribed by Anna University, the various academic activities were planned by the academic council members of our college and it will be published as an institution's academic calendar.

This academic calendar comprises of various activities such as the schedule of internal assessment tests, class committee meetings, and completion of the syllabus so that faculty can plan their co- curricular work accordingly. Faculty are allotted theory and practical courses based on their qualification, expertise, and willingness. Faculty once allotted theory and practical subjects will be preparing the course plan adhering to the institution's academic calendar and class timetable, faculty attending one-to-one meetings before the class begins.

Our institution follows a well-systematic examination process, where standard question papers setting incorporated using Bloom’s taxonomy, which will be prepared by the subject-handled faculty, Verified by heads of the department well-planned hall arrangements for internal assessment tests, circulation of attendance sheets during the test, well prompt evaluation process by the subject handled faculty and dispatch of evaluated answer sheet to students, we have verification committee to verify the evaluated internal assessment papers and test report to parents were followed. For every subject handled faculty will be maintaining the Log-Book for attendance, Course file for theory subject which includes, the Students name list duly signed by the class in charge, HOD and Principal, Syllabus copy, Course Objectives, Course Outcomes, CO-PO mapping, Course delivery plan, content beyond the syllabus, Time Table (Class Timetable, Individual Faculty Timetable). Internal Assessment question paper, Internal Assessment Test Mark Analysis, GAP analysis, Question Bank, Previous year question papers, end semester question paper, QP feedback. Then, the course file for the laboratory course includes the log Book for attendance, the Student name list duly signed by the class in charge, HoD and Principal, Syllabus copy, Batch Details, and Practical plan.

Self Declaration

download button