For admission: 900-362-5277 / 994-047-1271

Contact: +91 9952971485

Email : office@adhi.edu.in

NAAC

COORDINATOR DESK

Greetings!

The establishment of Internal Quality Assessment Cell (IQAC) was in 2016, as a post-accreditation quality sustenance measure as prescribed by the National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC). The IQAC was shaped to evaluate and achieve quality improvement in Adhi College of Engineering. The aspiration of IQAC is to enhance and ensure the quality of academic and administrative performance of the institution by developing a scheme of conscious, consistent and continuous quality progress.

The IQAC also meets regularly to assess and monitor quality issues and commence measures for quality sustenance. The IQAC happens to be one of the key components of the college which ensures quality and constant development in all the units of the Institution.

With Best Wishes and Regards
Dr.V.PARANTHAMAN
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
Adhi College of Engineering and Technology.
Ph:9952971485
Coordinator IQAC
IQAC

Criterion 1 – Curricular Aspects (100)

METRIC NO DESCRIPTION WEIGHTAGE
Key Indicator – 1.1 Curricular Planning and Implementation(20)
1.1.1
QlM
The institution ensures effective curriculum planning and delivery through a well-planned and documented process including Academic calendar and conduct of continuous Internal Assessment. 20
Key Indicator - 1.2 Academic Flexibility(30)
1.2.1
QnM
Number of Add-on / Certificate / Value added courses offered on the MOOC programs like SWAYAM, NPTEL, etc. where the students of the institution have benefited during the last five years. 15
1.2.2
QnM
Percentage of students enrolled in Certificate / Add-on /Value added courses and also completed online MOOC programs like SWAYAM, NPTEL, etc., as against the total number of students during the last five years. 15
Key Indicator - 1.3 Curriculum Enrichment(30)
1.3.1
QlM
Institution integrates crosscutting issues relevant to Professional Ethics, Gender, Human Values, Environment and Sustainability in transacting the curriculum. 10
1.3.2
QnM
Percentage of students undertaking project work/field work/ internships (Data for the latest completed academic year). 20
Key Indicator - 1.4 Feedback System (20)
1.4.1
QnM
Institution obtains feedback on the academic performance and ambience of the institution from various stakeholders, such as Students, Teachers, Employers, Alumni etc. and action taken report on the feedback is made available on institutional website.

Feedback processes of the institution may be classified as follows:

A. Feedback collected, analysed, action taken & communicated to the relevant bodies and feedback hosted on the institutional website.
B. Feedback collected, analysed and action has been taken and communicated to the relevant bodies.
C. Feedback collected and analysed.
D. Feedback collected.
E. Feedback not collected.

20

Criterion 2 – Teaching Learning and Evaluation (350)

METRIC NO DESCRIPTION WEIGHTAGE
Key Indicator – 2.1. Student Enrolment and Profile (40)
2.1.1
QnM
Enrolment percentage 20
2.1.2
QnM
Percentage of seats filled against reserved categories (SC, ST, OBC etc.) as per applicable reservation policy for the first year admission during the last five years 20
Key Indicator – 2.2. Student Teacher Ratio (40)
2.2.1
QnM
Student – Full time Teacher Ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year) 40
Key Indicator 2.3. Teaching- Learning Process (40)
2.3.1
QlM
Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences and teachers use ICT- enabled tools including online resources for effective teaching and learning process 40
Key Indicator 2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality (40)
2.4.1
QnM
Percentage of full-time teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years 15
2.4.2
QnM
Percentage of full time teachers with NET/SET/SLET/ Ph. D./D.Sc. / D.Litt./L.L.D. during the last five years (consider only highest degree for count) 25
Key Indicator 2.5. Evaluation Process and Reforms (40)
2.5.1
QlM
Mechanism of internal/ external assessment is transparent and the grievance redressal system is time- bound and efficient 40
Key Indicator 2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcome (90)
2.6.1
QlM
Programme Outcomes (POs) and Course Outcomes (COs) for all Programmes offered by the institution are stated and displayed on website 25
2.6.2
QlM
Attainment of POs and COs are evaluated. 20
2.6.3
QnM
Pass percentage of Students during last five years (excluding backlog students) 45
Key Indicator – 2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey (60)
2.7.1
QnM
Online student satisfaction survey regarding to teaching learning process. 60

Criterion 3 – Research, Innovations and Extension (110)

METRIC NO DESCRIPTION WEIGHTAGE
Key Indicator- 3.1 Resource Mobilization for Research (10)
3.1.1
QnM
Grants received from Government and non-governmental agencies for research projects / endowments in the institution during the last five years. 10
Key Indicator- 3.2 Innovation Ecosystem (15)
3.2.1
QlM
Institution has created an ecosystem for innovations, Indian Knowledge System (IKS),including awareness about IPR, establishment of IPR cell, Incubation centre and other initiatives for the creation and transfer of knowledge/technology and the outcomes of the same are evident 10
3.2.2
QnM
Number of workshops/seminars/conferences including programs conducted on Research Methodology, Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and entrepreneurship during the last five years 5
Key Indicator- 3.3 Research Publication and Awards (25)
3.3.1
QnM
Number of research papers published per teacher in the Journals as notified on UGC CARE list during the last five years 10
3.3.2
QnM
Number of books and chapters in edited volumes/books published and papers published in national/ international conference proceedings per teacher during last five years 15
Key Indicator- 3.4 Extension Activities (40)
3.4.1
QlM
Outcomes of Extension activities in the neighborhood community in terms of impact and sensitizing the students to social issues for their holistic development during the last five years. 15
3.4.2
QlM
Awards and recognitions received for extension activities from government / government recognised bodies 5
3.4.3
QnM
Number of extension and outreach programs conducted by the institution through organized forums including NSS/NCC with involvement of community during the last five years 20
Key Indicator- 3.5 Collaboration (20)
3.5.1
QnM
Number of functional MoUs/linkages with institutions/ industries in India and abroad for internship, on-the-job training, project work, student / faculty exchange and collaborative research during the last five years 20

Criterion 4 – Infrastructure and Learning Resources (100)

METRIC NO DESCRIPTION WEIGHTAGE
Key Indicator 4.1 Physical Facilities (30)
4.1.1
QlM
The Institution has adequate infrastructure and other facilities for
a. teaching learning, viz., classrooms, laboratories, computing equipment etc
b. ICT – enabled facilities such as smart class, LMS etc.
Facilities for Cultural and sports activities, yoga centre, games (indoor and outdoor), Gymnasium, auditorium etc
20
4.1.2
QnM
Percentage of expenditure for infrastructure development and augmentation excluding salary during the last five years 10
Key Indicator – 4.2 Library as a learning Resource (20)
4.2.1
QlM
Library is automated with digital facilities using Integrated Library Management System (ILMS), adequate subscriptions to e-resources and journals are made. The library is optimally used by the faculty and students 20
Key Indicator 4.3 IT Infrastructure (30)
4.3.1
QlM
Institution frequently updates its IT facilities and provides sufficient bandwidth for internet connection 20
4.3.2
QnM
Student Computer ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year) 10
Key Indicator 4.4 Maintenance of Campus Infrastructure (20)
4.4.1
QnM
Percentage expenditure incurred on maintenance of physical facilities and academic support facilities excluding salary component, during the last five years 20

Criterion 5 Student Support and Progression (140)

METRIC NO DESCRIPTION WEIGHTAGE
Key Indicator 5.1 Student Support (50)
5.1.1
QnM
Percentage of students benefited by scholarships and freeships provided by the institution, government and non-government bodies, industries, individuals, philanthropists during the last five years 20
5.1.2
QnM
Following capacity development and skills enhancement activities are organized for improving students capability
1. Soft skills
2. Language and communication skills
3. Life skills (Yoga, physical fitness, health and hygiene, selfemployment and entrepreneurial skills)
4. Awareness of trends in technology
10
5.1.3
QnM
Percentage of students benefitted by guidance for competitive examinations and career counseling offered by the Institution during the last five years 10
5.1.4
QnM
The institution adopts the following for redressal of student grievances including sexual harassment and ragging cases
1. Implementation of guidelines of statutory/regulatory bodies
2. Organisation wide awareness and undertakings on policies with zero tolerance
3. Mechanisms for submission of online/offline students grievances
4. Timely redressal of the grievances through appropriate committees
10
Key Indicator 5.2 Student Progression (35)
5.2.1
QnM
Percentage of placement of outgoing students and students progressing to higher education during the last five years 25
5.2.2
QnM
Percentage of students qualifying in state/national/ international level examinations during the last five years 10
Key Indicator – 5.3 Student Participation and Activities (45)
5.3.1
QnM
Number of awards/medals for outstanding performance in sports/ cultural activities at University / state/ national / international level during the last five years 20
5.3.2
QnM
Average number of sports and cultural programs in which students of the Institution participated during last five years 25
Key Indicator – 5.4 Alumni Engagement (10)
5.4.1
QlM
There is a registered Alumni Association that contributes significantly to the development of the institution through financial and/or other support services 10

Criterion 6 – Governance, Leadership and Management (100)

METRIC NO DESCRIPTION WEIGHTAGE
Key Indicator 6.1 Institutional Vision and Leadership (15)
6.1.1
QlM
The institutional governance and leadership are in accordance with the vision and mission of the Institution and it is visible in various institutional practices such as NEP implementation, sustained institutional growth, decentralization, participation in the institutional governance and in their short term and long term Institutional Perspective Plan. 15
Key Indicator 6.2 Strategy Development and Deployment (12)
6.2.1
QlM
The institutional perspective plan is effectively deployed and functioning of the institutional bodies is effective and efficient as visible from policies, administrative setup, appointment, service rules, and procedures, etc. 8
6.2.2
QnM
Institution implements e-governance in its operations
1. Administration including complaint management
2. Finance and Accounts
3. Student Admission and Support
4. Examinations
4
Key Indicator 6.3 Faculty Empowerment Strategies (33)
6.3.1
QlM
The institution has performance appraisal system, effective welfare measures for teaching and non-teaching staff and avenues for career development/progression 6
6.3.2
QnM
Percentage of teachers provided with financial support to attend conferences/workshops and towards membership fee of professional bodies during the last five years 12
6.3.3
QnM
Percentage of teaching and non-teaching staff participating in Faculty development Programmes (FDP), Management Development Programmes (MDPs) professional development /administrative training programs during the last five years 15
Key Indicator – 6.4 Financial Management and Resource Mobilization (10)
6.4.1
QlM
Institution has strategies for mobilization and optimal utilization of resources and funds from various sources (government/ nongovernment organizations) and it conducts financial audits regularly (internal and external) 10
Key Indicator 6.5 Internal Quality Assurance System (30)
6.5.1
QlM
Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) has contributed significantly for institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies and processes. It reviews teaching learning process, structures & methodologies of operations and learning outcomes at periodic intervals and records the incremental improvement in various activities 15
6.5.2
QnM
Quality assurance initiatives of the institution include:
1. Regular meeting of Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC); Feedback collected, analysed and used for improvements
2. Collaborative quality initiatives with other institution(s) / membership of international networks
3. Participation in NIRF
4. Any other quality audit/accreditation recognized by state, national or international agencies such as NAAC, NBA, ISO Certification etc
15

Criterion 7 Institutional Values and Best Practices (100)

METRIC NO DESCRIPTION WEIGHTAGE
Key Indicator – 7.1 Institutional Values and Social Responsibilities (50)
7.1.1
QlM
Institution has initiated the Gender Audit and measures for the promotion of gender equity during the last five years. 10
7.1.2
QnM
The Institution has facilities and initiatives for
1. Alternate sources of energy and energy conservation measures
2. Management of the various types of degradable and nondegradable waste
3. Water conservation
4. Green campus initiatives
5. Disabled-friendly, barrier free environment
20
7.1.3
QnM
Quality audits on environment and energy regularly undertaken by the Institution. The institutional environment and energy initiatives are confirmed through the following
1. Green audit / Environment audit
2. Energy audit
3. Clean and green campus initiatives
4. Beyond the campus environmental promotion activities
10
7.1.4
QlM
Describe the Institutional efforts/initiatives in providing an inclusive environment i.e., tolerance and harmony towards cultural, regional, linguistic, communal socioeconomic diversity and Sensitization of students and employees to the constitutional obligations: values, rights, duties and responsibilities of citizens 10
Key Indicator 7.2 Best Practices (30)
7.2.1
QlM
Describe two best practices successfully implemented by the Institution as per NAAC format provided in the Manual 30
Key Indicator – 7.3 Institutional Distinctiveness (20)
7.3.1
QlM
Portray the performance of the Institution in one area distinctive to its priority and thrust within 1000 words 20

DVV Clarifications

Extended Profile
Criterion 1
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
3.1.1 Grants received from Government and non-governmental agencies for research projects / endowments in the institution during the last five years (INR in Lakhs)
3.2.2 Number of workshops/seminars/conferences including on Research Methodology, Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and entrepreneurship conducted during the last five years
3.3.1 Number of research papers published per teacher in the Journals notified on UGC care list during the last five years
3.3.2 Number of books and chapters in edited volumes/books published and papers published in national/ international conference proceedings per teacher during last five years
3.4.3 Number of extension and outreach programs conducted by the institution through organized forums including NSS/NCC with involvement of community during the last five years.
3.5.1 Number of functional MoUs/linkages with institutions/ industries in India and abroad for internship, on-the-job training, project work, student / faculty exchange and collaborative research during the last five years.
Criterion 4
Criterion 5
5.1.1 Percentage of students benefited by scholarships and freeships provided by the institution, government and non-government bodies, industries, individuals, philanthropists during the last five years
5.1.2 Following capacity development and skills enhancement activities are organised for improving students capability
1. Soft skills 2. Language and communication skills 3. Life skills (Yoga, physical fitness, health and hygiene) 4. ICT/computing skills
5.1.3 Percentage of students benefitted by guidance for competitive examinations and career counseling offered by the Institution during the last five years
5.1.4 The institution adopts the following for redressal of student grievances including sexual harassment and ragging cases
1. Implementation of guidelines of statutory/regulatory bodies 2. Organisation wide awareness and undertakings on policies with zero tolerance 3. Mechanisms for submission of online/offline students grievances 4. Timely redressal of the grievances through appropriate committees
5.2.1 Percentage of placement of outgoing students and students progressing to higher education during the last five years
5.2.2 Percentage of students qualifying in state/national/ international level examinations during the last five years
5.3.1 Number of awards/medals for outstanding performance in sports/ cultural activities at University / state/ national / international level (award for a team event should be counted as one) during the last five years
5.3.2 Average number of sports and cultural programs in which students of the Institution participated during last five years (organised by the institution/other institutions)
Criterion 6
6.2.2 Institution implements e-governance in its operations
1. Administration 2. Finance and Accounts 3. Student Admission and Support 4. Examination
6.3.2 Percentage of teachers provided with financial support to attend conferences/workshops and towards membership fee of professional bodies during the last five years
6.3.3 Percentage of teaching and non-teaching staff participating in Faculty development Programmes (FDP), Management Development Programmes (MDPs) professional development /administrative training programs during the last five years
6.5.2 Quality assurance initiatives of the institution include:
1. Regular meeting of Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC); quality improvement initiatives identified and implemented 2. Academic and Administrative Audit (AAA) and follow-up action taken 3. Collaborative quality initiatives with other institution(s) 4. Participation in NIRF and other recognized rankings 5. Any other quality audit/accreditation recognized by state, national or international agencies such as NAAC, NBA etc.
Criterion 7

Best Practices